Traveling through Ecuador

September 20, 2011

When I arrived at my hotel in Quito I realized I was short one pair of underwear.  Digging into the dirty laundry bag I pulled from my backpack, the strong smell of clothes still damp with river water, sweat, sunscreen and deet began to fill the room. After finding the cleanest dirty pair and quickly rinsing them in the bathroom sink, I hung the briefs across the shower curtain with the hope they would be dry before I left the next day back to Washington. I then reached into the closet to grab another (empty) laundry bag, adding an additional layer of protection between the already double-bagged dirty clothes and the remaining clean air in the room.

For the past week and a half, I had been traveling across Ecuador with a good college friend who had moved to Cuenca to learn Spanish. He had allotted one full year to this pursuit before returning to Iowa for his final year of medical school. We met in Cuenca on a Wednesday evening, and I spent my time walking around and exploring the old colonial city while Andy finished up his Spanish classes during the rest of the week.

Starting in earnest on Friday afternoon, our trip had consisted of several seven hour bus rides, winding us north though the Andes Mountains to Ambato and Banos, then through Quito to Lago Agrio on Ecuador’s northern border, some 20km south of Columbia. Arriving in Lago Agrio around midnight on Monday, we were both exhausted after the long bus ride that brought us up from Quito and from the hiking and mountain biking in Banos over the previous weekend, including a 61km ride through dramatic mountains to Puyo that involved passing at least 100 different waterfalls en route (this ride is known as La Ruta de las Cascadas, or “highway of the waterfalls”).

Lago Agrio was now our starting point to head into the Amazonian basin where we would be spending three nights at the Jamu Lodge in the Reserva Cuyabeno Produccion Faunistica, a seasonally flooded forest in northeast Ecuador that traces the Columbian and Peruvian boarders. This jungle visit was to be the highlight of the 10-day trip, even as the unexpected beauty of Banos and La Ruta de las Cascadas now seemed tough to beat. In fact, our initial itinerary involved spending two days climbing Volcan Cotopaxi, a 5,897 meter active volcano in central Ecuador before heading to Jamu Lodge. While on our first bus heading out of Cuenca, we decided to visit Banos instead of Cotopaxi to avoid arriving in the rainforest with the lingering effects of the altitude sickness we had convinced ourselves would accompany the hike.

Waking up the next morning and eating our breakfast in front of the Hotel D’Mario, we both looked around at the surrounding tables to try and guess if any of the people we saw would be joining us later that morning as we traveled to the lodge. The desayuno Americano (“American breakfast”) I ordered was not the best I had eaten on this trip, and while it consisted of the standard toast with butter and preserves, scrambled eggs, fresh fruit juice and instant coffee (why a country that grows such high-quality coffee would be hooked on Nescafe is beyond me), I cleaned each of the plates on the table. While some sort of meat usually accompanies the desayuno Americano, this wasn’t the case at the Hotel D’Mario.

Right at 9AM – our designated meeting time – a driver in a large van pulled in front of the hotel and walked over to our table (it can’t be too hard to pick out a couple gringos, each with a large backpack). After loading our bags in the back of the van – which was already quite full with the various provisions we’d be relying on the rest of the week – we boarded and each took our own row of seats for the two-hour drive into the rainforest. Andy and I were joined on the van by a 38 year old female attorney from Madrid named Cristinia, and a 28 year old nurse from Munich named Miriam. Cristinia was on holiday visiting her brother in Quito, where he worked as a photographer, while Miriam was in Ecuador to facilitate a professional transition from nurse to midwife by working in a medical clinic. Andy and I were hoping there would be other people joining us at Jamu Lodge.

The two-hour drive from Lago Agrio to the entrance of the Reserva Cuyabeno was beautiful, as were all of the previous bus rides that had carried us and our backpacks thus far. Upon traveling through Ecuador, it’s amazing to think that this is the most densely populated country in South America. Approximately the same size as Colorado, Ecuador is home to an enormously diverse geography that includes tropical Pacific coastline, 18,000 foot tall active volcanoes, high-desert plains, Amazonian rain forests, crashing waterfalls, mountain rivers and nearly everything in-between

After reaching the Reserve entrance and eating a quick lunch of rice and chicken that the bus driver provided each of us in little Tupperware containers, I walked towards a group of German tourists that had gathered around a few benches and were taking pictures of some animal that looked like a cross between a monkey, rat and squirrel. The animal kept moving between some apple pieces that had been laid on the ground and, much to the delight of the Germans, would sometime start nibbling on a piece of apple, creating a perfect photo opportunity. All of the Germans seemed to have very expensive, professional-looking cameras.

I later learned there were eight different jungle lodges operating in Reserva Cuyabeno, and while this group of Germans turned out to be staying at one of the other lodges, we ended up passing them at least four times over the next few days as we zipped down the river in motorized canoes.

Walking back to the bus, Andy and I helped the driver unload the provisions into the boat, and then we began the two hour boat trip from the Reserve entrance to Jamu Lodge. After about 30mins had passed, we opened a box of cheap Argentinean wine that was left over from the bus ride the night before, drinking it out of a water bottle as we traveled deeper into the jungle.

Ecuadorians resemble Central Americans or Peruvians in appearance much more than the more European-looking Argentineans, Columbians or Chileans. Around 30 percent of Ecuador is set-aside in national parks and preserves, though many of these preserves, including Reserva Cuyabeno, have small indigenous populations living within the borders. Thinking of Ecuador as the densest country in South America while we continued down the river, across mangrove-lined lagoons and through virgin rainforest to Jamu Lodge was a living reminder of just how “wild” this continent remains, nearly 500 years after Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors first marched through. In fact, it’s probably this very wilderness that explains the huge variance in development between North and South America that persists today. Traveling down the river towards Jamu Lodge was like going back in time, and peering alongside the riverbanks looking for wildlife presented the same opportunities for discovery that had greeted Francisco Pizarro when he arrived in Ecuador in 1532 with his small band of 180 Spanish soldiers, a journey that ended with the conquering of the Inca’s.

After finishing the wine, Andy and I spoke with Cristinia and Miriam until our canoe motored up in front of the lodge. It was now late in the afternoon, and we learned the other visitors (there were others here!) were already split into two groups with about 8 people each. A few of these people were sitting under the main cabana, and we all exchanged the typical travel introductions (name, occupation, country of residence and purpose/duration of their time in Ecuador). Some of the lodge workers were playing soccer on a makeshift field near the main cabana.

Each of the guest rooms at Jamu Lodge was named after a jungle animal, and our room, Tarantula,  came to life later that evening when a full-grown tarantula was chased out of the kitchen and towards the dining tables. The lodge could accommodate about 50 people and was designed to leave a minimal environmental footprint. River water was filtered and used in the sinks, toilets and showers, a few solar panels provided guests with a battery charging station each morning from 8-9:30AM (this was the only time electricity was available), candles were used for light and each of the cabanas was designed to fit in with the surrounding rainforest. A natural extension of these design principles meant that many of the forest animals viewed the lodge as part of their habitat as well, and giant spiders, geckos, bats and frogs and other creatures would routinely pass through. Each bed had an accompanying mosquito net, though the mosquitos were surprisingly few and far-between.

After dropping our packs off in the Tarantula Room, Andy and I joined the group that was preparing to go piranha finishing and would then stop at the Laguna Grande for a pre-dinner swim. During the 20 minute canoe ride, our guide, Rodrigo, mentioned that Cuyabeno has both wet and dry seasons, and during the dry season (mainly December), the laguna we would later be swimming in would be completely dry. The lodge was open year-round, but the dry season presented numerous other logistical challenges as travel within the Reserva was all done via canoe or foot.

With reeds outfitted with about six feet of line, a basic hook and using raw meat for bait, we caught a number of small white river piranhas – the most common of the three different types of piranhas found in Cuyabeno – as we stopped at various points along the river. At some point during the fishing I scraped my little toe, causing it to bleed. Once back at the lodge, I convinced the people sitting around me at the dinner table that the wound came from a bite from one of these little piranhas.  A few days later we would return and catch larger piranhas that were more reminiscent of a National Geographic special than of the little ones we caught before and were making fun of.

Being completely off the grid and not tied to the hands of a watch, days are divided into a four basic sections : breakfast, lunch, siesta and dinner. Between each of these daily benchmarks, time was spent either on the river or walking through the forest looking for wildlife, or lounging in one of the numerous hammocks reading, journaling or napping. As I was able to complete each of these activities in a swimsuit (adding a pair of hiking pants when trekking in the jungle), I didn’t change my clothes once. This is why I hadn’t realized before arriving in Quito that I needed to wash a pair of underwear prior to heading home.

While the wildlife and complete integration with nature were the most obvious benefits to staying at Jamu Lodge, interacting with the other guests provided a similar source of constant inspiration (and interesting stories). While each of the guests at Jamu had started their trip the same way (booking through a travel agency in Quito, Cuenca, Guayaquil or Banos and selecting either a 2-, 3-, 4- or 5-day option), they were all drawn to the rainforest for different reasons. Germans, Swiss and French were the most common nationalities, collectively comprising about half of the all the guests. With Andy and myself representing the US, we were also joined by at least Canada, Spain, Holland, the UK and Ecuador (Ecuadorians are naturally very proud of their beautiful country and I met a number of them who were in the middle of their own touristic activities). Across this diverse, albeit Eurocentric group, visitors to Jamu were coming from and going to other locations in Ecuador (Cotopaxi, Banos, Galapagos Islands, etc.), or were just passing through while learning Spanish, volunteering, taking time off or just traveling for the sake of traveling (at least three people at Jamu were in the middle of year-long, round-the-world trips).

The conversations we had around meals and in-between our activities were inspiring in all of their possibilities. Some of these conversations didn’t progress much beyond the typical travel introductions (recall: name, occupation, country of residence and purpose/duration of their time in Ecuador), but even these provided interesting insights into what had driven each of these people to trade two of their most valuable resources (time and money) to travel to the remote Amazonian basin. Of course, it was the conversations that progressed beyond this point that were most memorable.

Boarding the canoe back to the Reserva entrance on Friday morning, Andy and I each had a ceremonial Pilsner (one of the two national Ecuadorian beers) while we reminisced over the last four days in the jungle – hiking (both day and night), swinging Tarzan-style from tree vines, finding hyper-poisonous frogs in a swamp, watching a group of spider monkeys swing through the canopy and leap across the river, visiting a shaman in a local indigenous community, and of course, the conversations that progressed throughout. Because of the overlap involved with many 2-. 3-, 4- and 5-day visitors leaving together, we were spread in two different canoes as we headed back to the waiting van, this time carrying the empty cartons, bottles and provisions with us to be recycled and reused.

After a quick lunch that consisted of tuna pasta in the same Tupperware containers and on the same picnic tables our visit began with, our group boarded the van for the two-hour bus ride to Lago Agrio. A final seven-hour bus ride to Quito then brought Andy and I to the hotel I was now drying my underwear in.

Later that evening while walking around Plaza Foch (the central square in Quito’s Mariscal Sucre, or “new town”), Andy and I ran into two people we had met at our hostel in Banos, and then shortly afterwards saw a German couple who were on the shuttle back from Jamu Lodge with us earlier that day. This was the only representation I witnessed of Ecuador’s apparent density, and as I boarded my flight back to DC the next day, seemed a fitting conclusion to my Ecuadorian experience.

Mentoring Doesn’t Work When You Call It Mentoring

July 6, 2011

Yesterday I was in a conversation with a colleague at work on the topic of mentoring. We’ve all been encouraged at work or school to seek out mentors, sometimes going to special networking events designed to connect people at different stages in their careers. Mentoring relationships are generally very useful. It’s always good to expand your personal network, and it’s often better to learn from someone else’s mistakes or successes when determining what to do in work or life.

So while I’ve always been a strong advocate of mentoring for the reasons mentioned above, I can’t think of any cases where a mentoring relationship was successful when it was branded as “mentoring.”

For mentoring to actually work, there needs to be an actual desire on the part of both the mentor and mentee to connect at some level and it takes effort to maintain these types of relationships. I’ve never met anyone that I’d consider a mentor or mentee at a “mentoring” event organized through work, school or any other organization. And it’s not for lack of trying. One of the reasons why mentoring/networking events are so popular is because people inherently recognize the value of successful mentoring relationships. The problem is that while there are plenty of good reasons to go to these events, such as free cocktails and a chance to catch up with friends, if your goal is mentoring, you’re in the wrong place.

I’m convinced mentoring is only successful at more intimate levels when people do one of two things: (i) seek out a specific mentor, or (ii) seek out a specific mentee. The key word here is “specific.” If you’re going to a big networking/mentoring event, chances are you’ll have a few interesting conversations that end with the event. On the other hand, if you specifically seek out someone and ask to meet for lunch or coffee, your chances of starting a successful relationship are much greater. While this could happen in either direction, it’s far more common for the mentee to go through the groundwork of finding someone they’re interested in meeting with and taking the initiative to reach out and set up a meeting.

So if you’re interested in finding a mentor, what should you do? First, seek out people who have had interesting or successful careers and send them an e-mail requesting to meet. If you’ve never reached out to a senior person in the office or a prominent graduate from your alma mater to discuss career development, you’d be surprised at how often a simple e-mail request can materialize into lunch and then a lasting relationship. People appreciate initiative, and it’s also flattering when someone requests a meeting for these purposes. While your initial goal might be to find a mentor, successful mentoring relationships usually don’t retain the mentor/mentee dynamics. The initial e-mail request can very often lead to someone becoming an advocate for your career, a trusted advisor or maybe even a friend. And this is why the title is “mentoring doesn’t work when you call it mentoring.” The people who are the best mentors are much more than what that word captures, so while a relationship might start at the mentoring level, the successful ones will advance beyond to something much more personal.

So if you’re looking for a mentor – and there are plenty of great reasons to do so – then skip the next networking/mentoring event you’re invited to (you know it will likely be a waste of time anyways) and just send an e-mail or call someone you’d like to meet with. Again, if you haven’t done this before, you’ll be surprised at how effective it can be.

Release of My Book, Cornucopia

June 30, 2011

The link has gone live on Amazon and you can pick up a copy of Cornucopia: Leveraging Agriculture to Improve Health and Nutrition here.  

At a brief 84 pages, the text was cut down to appeal to a general readership and engage the people who would not generally think about the intrinsic connection between agriculture, health and nutrition (and it also means you have no excuse to not pick up and read a copy!). At a time when the U.S. spends nearly as much money treating largely preventable dietary diseases such as obesity, diabetes and hypertension as on national defense – approximately $500B annually – improving our nation’s health has never been more important. Returning to the farm is a great place to start.

Thanks again to everyone who had a hand in helping me write, edit and revise the book, and details will be posted shortly for an official launch party in the DC area.

<<<<>>>

Interested in the topic? I also speak about agriculture, health and nutrition at universities, government forums and international conferences. Please e-mail me if you’d like me to speak at your organization!  Here’s the video from a panel discussion at the IFPRI 2020 Conference in New Delhi, India this past February.

A Weekend in Copenhagen

April 13, 2011

Last weekend my girlfriend and I were in Copenhagen after booking round-trip tickets that were available at only $180 during a mistake fare by Delta/KLM. We left around 3PM on Thursday, and were back in DC by 3PM on Monday.  The flights over on Delta were fine, but the return segments on KLM really reinforced how much better European carriers are than their US counterparts for trans-Atlantic routes. Decent food, good in-seat entertainment, comfortable seats, etc…there’s just not much of a comparison between Delta and KLM. If you have a choice between US airlines (United, Delta, American, etc.) or European carriers (KLM, Virgin Atlantic, Air France, Lufthansa, etc.), always go with the European carrier if the cost is similar.

For our trip, we stayed at the Radisson Blu Falconer Hotel. Radisson offer a “Friends & Family” rate at most of their European properties for only 80euro/night, and that includes breakfast and Internet (here’s the special code). Not a bad deal when you’re in a city where a cup of coffee costs $10. Prior to our trip, Radisson provided us a free status match to their Silver Elite level (equivalent to SPG Gold), so we got a room on their top floor with perfect views across the entire city and harbor. While we only took advantage of the free breakfast buffet on the last day, it was definitely worth waking up for and was probably one of the better meals we had during the trip. (Normally we would try and sublease an apartment of Craigslist, but this didn’t seem to be a popular option in the Danish capitol).

During the weekend, we spent most of our time enjoying the perfect spring weather (no wind, 70F, sunny, etc.), A canal tour provided the best overview of the city layout, while we also enjoyed self-guided walking tours around the more touristy areas of  Nyhavn and Christianshavn  (including the “free state of Christiana”). Copenhagen is hard to not enjoy – the people are beautiful, friendly and stylish, and it’s the most clean city I’ve been to other than Geneva. All public transit runs on schedule (even though ~95% of Copenhageners have bikes) and I’d imagine a higher percentage of the population speaks fluent English than in the US. This was definitely an easy tourist destination.

But make no mistake about it, Copenhagen is expensive. At bars, a cocktail costs over $15 and even a Danish pastry and coffee will set you back $10 from the cheapest establishments. The Copenhagen metro was excellent for getting around the city, but one-way tickets were at least $4 each. While most of the food we had was good, we did make the mistake of visiting Wagamama’s, a UK-based chain that we both like in London. While I remembered the food as being really good for pan-Asian, our dinner there on Saturday was completely forgettable and definitely not worth the cost. We did sample some of the nightlife, and both Rust and Culture Box were good for dancing and electronic music. 7/11 was the best place for a “snack” (don’t mistake Danish 7/11’s for the US version).

Primarily due to the excellent weather, we ended up not visiting any of the major museums but did stop by the Danish Design Center. The Center’s main focus seemed to be in displaying the many ways that Scandinavian design has influenced and infiltrated the products we use on a daily basis. From vacuum cleaners to kitchen ware and furniture thru industrial design, the Center did a good job of showing how Danish companies have designed the products so many people use around the world. While we hoped to get some shopping in, the fact that most stores closed at 4PM on Saturday and were closed Sunday limited the financial damage of buying anything in one of the world’s most expensive cities.

At lunch on Saturday, an Aussie expat remarked that when he moved to Copenhagen three years ago, the most descriptive overview he received of the city was that “there’s really nothing bad to say about Copenhagen.” Our last weekend reinforced this view. I can see the attraction of raising a young family in the city or retiring with the generous social safety net (a result of 50-60% taxation). When an ambulance drove past our hotel on Sunday afternoon, it genuinely surprised us that there would even be a need for ambulances in Copenhagen. I mean, what could go wrong??

Morning Musings

April 7, 2011

What if we’re all just characters in a dream?
Searching, seeking, for what life really means

But just when everything starts to make sense
We’re awakened and presented with a void of suspense

<<<>>>

Set to leave for Copenhagen later this afternoon for a long weekend trip. Surprisingly, it’s been nearly a year since I was last in Europe (the got-stuck-in-Berlin-Icelandic-volcano-foray).

A Twist on Traditional Blogging

April 5, 2011

All blogs seem to share the exact same model. A content generator (blog author) will write a post, publish it in the public domain, and then provide a forum for comments/feedback from readers (some blogs solicit feedback more readily than others). Two of my favorite blogs are Penelope Trunk and Marginal Revolution (MR). Both do an excellent job of engaging readers by consistently posting interesting content. They have huge readerships: Penelope has over 55,000 subscribers and MR has been viewed 38,000,000 times!

A typical post by Penelope or MR might generate anywhere from a few comments to a few hundred. One of Penelope’s most popular posts has generated over 800 comments from readers.

Now I visit these sites daily, yet rarely read any of the comments that are posted. I’m sure (at least some of) the comments are equally interesting/valuable and that I’d learn from them, but I never find myself clicking on the comment tab. Why is this?

As an experiment, I think it’d be interesting if Penelope or MR wrote a blog post about a given topic explicitly to drive traffic to the comments section and encourage debate. There wouldn’t even need to be any content in the original post, just ground rules and a topic to discuss! The aggregated comments would be the post. At the very least, I know that I would pay more attention to that comment section, even if I continue overlooking the others.

Value of Education: Class Rank, Alma Mater and More.

April 2, 2011

As a follow-up to my last post on lessons learned from consulting for those determining what career to pursue or school to attend, this morning I came across a few interesting articles that further dissect the value of higher education. To start, Gary Becker counters Krugman’s claim that the value of a college degree is decreasing. Becker believes the wage premium for those with a college degree will continue to increase (between 1980 to 2009, the wage premium for persons with a four year degree increased from 35% above high school graduates to around 55% higher), even as technology/outsourcing begin to displace more and more college educated workers.

So if you end up pursuing a college degree, what should you look for in a school, and what’s important once you get there? Well, according to an interesting education debate in the NY Times, where you attend school actually matters more than how you perform once you get there:

It may be that the college you attend has become a more important signal of student ability than it used to be, and your class rank less important. Differences in average student ability between colleges have increased over time, while differences in student ability within colleges have decreased. If students at your college are now more similar to you, employers may learn a lot about you from the name of your alma mater. This may help explain both the brutal competition and the post-admission collapse: the perception is that getting in is what really matters. Once you’re there, the battle is all but over.

In fact, amongst top schools, there seems to be a fascinating trend: as admission rates decrease (making a school more competitive to get in to), so to does the amount of time students spend studying once they get there. For instance, at Duke University the average study times for students has fallen by 67% over the course of one generation — from 33hrs per week to just 11hrs in 2007!

The NY Times piece notes that Stanford’s admission rate is down to around 7%. In comparison, my alma mater, the University of South Dakota, accepts around 87% of applicants. I’d argue either school really has more knowledge than any student could ever take out, and if anything the increased use of technology has made it easier to get a world class education regardless of where you live or study. So when evaluating job applications from students who attended different schools, what should count for more? Where they went to school, or how they did once they were there? My experience is a little biased, but I’m shocked at how little attention is paid to class rank, course load, extracurriculars and other factors that are probably a better indicator of how a student will perform in the working world than just a name brand degree. Would you hire someone just because they show up for an interview wearing a tailored Gucci suit as opposed to wearing an off-the-rack suit from Men’s Warehouse without even discussing what their capabilities are?

Now, for Stanford, having a 7% admission rate is both a source of institutional pride, as the Times article notes, and also a money-maker. Make no mistake about it, college applications are a big business. College Board (the non-profit group that administers the SAT and PSAT) makes over $25M annually by selling the names of high-performing students to colleges and universities who then engage in a blitzkrieg of direct mailings trying to get these students to apply to their schools. Presumably their motivation in recruiting these students is to field a strong class, but in reality these schools rake in $$ by convincing naive high school students (and their parents) they have a chance to get accepted. I wrote about this last November, and these application fees add up: Stanford brought in nearly $3M from “prospective” students who would ultimately receive a rejection letter.  Is it any surprise that these institutions continue to play up how special they are, hoping to attract even more students in applying (along with their $90 application fee)?

100, 50 or even 20 years ago, the landscape of higher education looked vastly different than it does today. Then, there was a small(er) collection of elite schools that commanded the top academic researches and resources. To get a truly “world class” education, you had to go where the knowledge was. But technology has really leveled this playing field. Now, when accounting for the huge price premium between state schools (my education cost was basically $0), versus private schools (with average debt loads ranging from $30k to $100k+), what are you really getting for this huge cost? In my opinion, you’re buying a brand and alumni network more than the actual education. For years this has been a safe bet (just like owning a home), but past performance does not guarantee future results.

As the price premium for specialization continues to increase, the premium for how you got that specialization will continue to decrease. For mathematical modelers, cybersecurity experts, computer programmers or six sigma supply chain analysts, it’s much more valuable to be the top student in a state school versus an average student in the Ivy Leagues (I know: I’ve hired them). I’m convinced this trend will continue, further eroding the price premium for elite schools who will either need to change their business model or strengthen their value proposition to survive. Who knows, in 20yrs maybe the majority of formal education will be done for free online? My advice: get the best education you can, at the lowest cost (the Univ of South Dakota is actually a great option), and before committing to becoming an indentured servant for an elite degree, ask yourself if it’s really worth it.

Specialization: Jack of All Trades, or Master of One? Lessons Learned from Consulting.

March 30, 2011

The best career advice still applicable to today’s economy is to specialize. With specialization comes expertise, and becoming an expert in your field is the surest bet for job security and advancement. Traditionally, I think most people think of specialization as mastery in one subject, but in my field (management and strategy consulting) I work with a number of world-class experts who specialize in being generalists. One of the key sources of value we consultants are able to provide our clients is an ability to “connect the dots” and think outside of organizational or industry silos.

To support this business model, most consulting firms organize their people around markets and capabilities. For instance, you may be a domain or market expert in the auto industry and are the go-to person for general industry knowledge and strategic thinking within that sector. Alternately, you might specialize in a functional area such as Enterprise Architecture or Supply Chain Management and apply those skills across markets or clients, be it Ford, Microsoft, the World Bank or Proctor & Gamble. Some of the best consultants are those who combine market/domain expertise with a functional skill set.

Aside from the consulting business model, high-value work in an increasingly knowledge-driven, globalization-infused economy requires intense specialization. So…should you specialize in one area, or many? The top person in any field is always in demand (even in dying industries), but the demand for those “dot-connectors” or those who can see “above the weeds” is also increasing.

Interestingly, one general trend is that the shift from traditional manufacturing to a more service-driven economy has led to an imbalance of specializations. A key reason unemployment has remained resiliently high is because there is a huge mismatch of skills in the supply and demand for labor resulting from this shift. There are plenty of machinists looking for assembly line work, and plenty of job openings for cybersecurity experts. This is why companies are reporting record profits, have tons of open job requisitions to help them grow and scale their businesses, but still aren’t hiring. They simply can’t find the “right” type of people. I believe the reason why can be traced back to education.

It’s no surprise to readers of this blog that I’m critical of the way higher education works in the U.S. Simply put, it fails most students. Dropout rates astronomically high and the ROI of degrees continues to plummet (and that’s not even looking at the supposed virtues of law school..). A major component of this problem is the division between generalist liberal arts schools and specialist technical/vocational/engineering schools. By far, the majority of college students in the U.S. are pursuing liberal arts degrees. When enrolling, most of these students are led to believe that a broad education will provide them with the skills needed to succeed in the global economy. With few exceptions, this belief no longer holds. If you aren’t one of the students who ends up dropping out (taking your debt, but no diploma), and are maybe even “lucky” enough to attend a top school (and pay top dollar), you’re still extremely limited in the careers you can pursue, either due to your lack of skills, or the fact you need to earn a lot of money to pay off those student loans.

Given this conundrum, I’m convinced the only value in pursuing higher education is if it cultivates analytical or creative faculties. No offence to communications majors, but that degree generally fulfills neither. The advantage in developing creative and analytical skills clearly lies with tech, trade and engineering schools. (side note: one of the reasons I’m a proponent of the consulting industry as a great place to work is because of the unique crossover in creative problem solving and analytical analysis).

But the point of this post is not to discuss the failings of higher education, but to discuss the merits of specialization.

So, going back to an earlier point, is it better to become a jack of all trades, or a master of one?  Does one of these lifestyle/work choices provide for a more interesting/secure/happy/fulfilling life? I’m not prescribing to have an answer to this question (it varies from person to person as well), but when looking at career options, it’s helpful to ask yourself “what makes me more uniquely qualified to do this job than someone else.” Invariably, the answer to this question will come down to your expertise – which is really just another word for specialization.What you specialize in as you’re building your career is up to you.

Poetry and Sleeplessness

March 29, 2011

I do believe opposites attract. While my girlfriend and I share the same affinity for electronic music, travel, everything Asian and DC’s Mt. Pleasant neighborhood, we definitely have our share of differences. One of these differences is that I can sleep pretty much anytime, anywhere, whereas she  spends more time talking about sleep than actually sleeping.

Last night was supposed to be an “early to bed night” that inevitably turned out otherwise, inspiring me to pen a few lines for those struggling with sleep:

I woke up this morning, bloodshot and sore

Another sleepless night, like the night before

What’s wrong, you ask, did I have a bad dream?

It was much worse than that, as these examples will glean

The sheets were taut and much too tight

And the blinds were open, letting in the street light

Whats worse, I affirm, the duvet lacked a fold

And there were gaps in my blankets  that let in the cold

I tossed and turned as the sun started its rise

Then my alarm started ringing…not a surprise…

So I rose from my slumber to meet the morn

Awaking to a dream of days forlorn.

Pondering the Demise of Penmanship

March 26, 2011

As I was addressing a few letters last week, I was surprised to see what my handwriting looked like in the light of day. While I write on a daily basis, most of this is either in a work notebook or a personal journal so there’s little reason to scrutinize over legibility. But in this case, I was legitimately concerned the postman would be unable to even decipher where my letters should be route!

Is penmanship just one more casualty from our shift to the digital age? After coming to the realization that my handwriting didn’t look like well, handwriting, I scrutinized others’ during a number of meetings this past week. My conclusion: not a single colleague under the age of 30 can consistently write legibly, whereas nearly every colleague in their 40s or above had a distinct and often attractive handwriting style. And make no mistake about it, in addition to the obvious implications of poor handwriting, if your writing is good, it also makes your ideas more convincing and powerful as they’re scribbled out on the whiteboard.

Following this realization, I resolved to pay closer attention to my own writing. Even with technology infiltrating all areas of daily life, surely there’s still a need for strong penmanship skills? There’s no denying the satisfaction of writing, or receiving, a thoughtful and well-written traditional letter. I’m not sure what sort of emphasis schools currently give handwriting (I remember calligraphy and cursive classes up until the 6th grade), but based on the poorly formed letters I witnessed last week, there’s a strong need to double-down on this area. I fear that if we continue on our current trajectory, in a few decades people will only know how to sign their name, and even that might be replaced by a digital stamp. Call me a Luddite, but there are still virtues to the handwritten word!

Well…last night I was addressing a few additional letters, and even with increased focus and calm, thoughtful strokes, my handwriting still left cause for concern. This could be a hard habit to break.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.